The Center of CX
Subscribe
Occupancy Risk

How hard are your agents running, and what does it cost?

Occupancy is the share of logged-in time agents spend handling contacts; the rest is the gap between one contact and the next. Enter your queue, attrition and costs to see your occupancy, the staff it takes to reach your target, and what a labelled planning model says running above target costs in turnover.

Every formula, band and assumption is in the published method.

Question 1 of 2 · Your queue
Question 2 of 2 · Attrition and cost
Your current occupancy · Caution
88.0%

44.0 Erlangs of workload over 50 agents. An Erlang is one hour of handling work arriving each hour, so it equals the agents needed at 100% busy.

Above 85% and up to 90%, the caution band. Fine for a busy hour or a seasonal peak. Run it every day and this model raises attrition 1.15x, so plan staffing back toward your target.

Reaching your 85% target

Agents to add
+2
Staffing cost, loaded
$116K/yr
Attrition cost of today's occupancy
$35K/yr

Staffing cost is the added agents at your hourly rate for a 2,080-hour year with a 1.3x benefits load. The attrition cost comes from a planning model, labelled below. Check both against your own figures before you decide.

Staffing Calculator: staff to your target and service level · Attrition Cost: price turnover in full

The occupancy ladder

OccupancyAgentsIdle a hourBandAttritionTurnover a year
70%63 agents18.0 min/hr idleHealthy35% attrition$291K/yr turnover
72%62 agents16.8 min/hr idleHealthy35% attrition$287K/yr turnover
74%60 agents15.6 min/hr idleHealthy35% attrition$278K/yr turnover
76%58 agents14.4 min/hr idleHealthy35% attrition$268K/yr turnover
78%57 agents13.2 min/hr idleHealthy35% attrition$264K/yr turnover
80%55 agents12.0 min/hr idleHealthy35% attrition$254K/yr turnover
82%54 agents10.8 min/hr idleHealthy35% attrition$250K/yr turnover
84%53 agents9.6 min/hr idleHealthy35% attrition$245K/yr turnover
86%52 agents8.4 min/hr idleCaution40% attrition$277K/yr turnover
88% (you)50 agents7.2 min/hr idleCaution40% attrition$266K/yr turnover
90%49 agents6.0 min/hr idleCaution40% attrition$261K/yr turnover
92%48 agents4.8 min/hr idleCritical49% attrition$311K/yr turnover
94%47 agents3.6 min/hr idleCritical49% attrition$304K/yr turnover
96%46 agents2.4 min/hr idleCritical49% attrition$298K/yr turnover
98%45 agents1.2 min/hr idleCritical49% attrition$291K/yr turnover

Each row shows the fewest agents that keep occupancy at or below that level. It does not check service level (the share of calls answered within a target time); the Staffing Calculator does that. Attrition and turnover cost use the planning multipliers below.

Planning assumptions on this page

1.15 multiple of baseline attrition: Attrition multiple applied while occupancy sits in the caution band, above the healthy maximum. Your entered attrition is taken as the rate at or below the healthy band. Heuristic, no published source.

1.4 multiple of baseline attrition: Attrition multiple applied while occupancy sits in the critical band, above the caution maximum, and whenever offered load exceeds staffed agents. Heuristic, no published source.

Paid hours: 40 a week and 2,080 a year, the full-time definition.

Benefits load 1.3x: Wage plus benefits and employer payroll burden, and nothing else. The narrowest of the three loads. Use it wherever a wage becomes a loaded hourly rate for unit metrics. Bands: healthy to 85%, caution to 90%, the platform's shared occupancy bands.

Why Staffing gives a different cost for this target

Reaching your 85% target, counted and priced each way:

  • $116K a yearOccupancy RiskThis page2 more agents on the phone, at wage plus benefits
  • $243K to $269K a yearStaffingThe same agents counted Staffing's way: 3 to 4 scheduled FTE after shrinkage of 28 to 35% (our planning range), fully loaded

Why they differ

  • Staffing counts scheduled FTE: the agents on the phone grossed up for shrinkage, the paid time agents spend off the phones (28 to 35% here). Occupancy Risk counts only the agents who must be on the phone.
  • Staffing prices an FTE fully loaded at 1.95 times wage, or at your own TCO figure: benefits, supervision, seats and technology. Occupancy Risk prices an agent at wage plus benefits, 1.3 times wage.
  • Staffing sizes agents with Erlang C against your service level and then holds the occupancy ceiling; Occupancy Risk divides the workload by the target and compares it with the agents you have today, so the starting point can differ too.
  • Use Staffing's figure for a budget, since it carries the whole cost of an added seat. Use Occupancy Risk's to see the agent time the target needs.

Open Staffing · How Occupancy Risk works

How others report it

Published figures to hold your result against. Each measures something slightly different, so read what it counts before you compare. None of them changes your result or its grade.

OccupancyPractice range

Targets from practice; no publisher here surveys what centers achieve. Each publisher's range is shown as it states it.

  • 85% to 90%Ideal rate, practitioner roundupSome suggest 80% to 90%; centers under 100 agents 70% to 75%. The page adds there is no definitive answer.Call Centre Helper, updated 22 Jul 2026. What Is the Right Figure for Contact Centre Occupancy?
  • 75% to 85%Industry standardSQM Group, 19 Jan 2023. What Are the Industry Standards for the Top Call Center KPIs?
  • 80% to 90%Recommended target, from a workforce software vendorIntradiem, 16 Mar 2022. Call Center Occupancy: What It Is and Why It's So Crucial for Success.
Agent pay where your agents workOfficial statistic

The US Bureau of Labor Statistics median for customer service representatives, May 2025. The tool opens at the national median; if you know your own pay, enter it in the tool.

  • $21.53Median hourly wage, customer service representatives, United States$44,770 a year, before benefits. Half earn more, half less.US Bureau of Labor Statistics, read on O*NET OnLine, May 2025. Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, May 2025, Customer Service Representatives (43-4051), by state.

Take this with you

The report downloads immediately. No email required, no wall.

Method 1.1, published 28 September 2026. How this is calculated

This scenario is too detailed to fit in a link. Download instead.

A person on our team sends it, usually within one business day. Your address is used to send this report and to reply if you ask a question. Nothing you entered leaves your browser unless you send it here, and the download never asks for it.

Run this next

Each result raises a sharper question. This is the diagnostic that answers it.

Staffing Requirement →
Model the staffing that brings occupancy to target.

Have someone read it

Send this analysis for an independent review. You get a written read on what the numbers support, what they do not, and which diagnostic is worth running next. No sales call. No vendor introduction.

Current occupancy
88.0%
Caution band. 44.0 Erlangs of workload over 50 agents.
Occupancy88.0%See the result